architect. scientist. academician.

Friday, November 5, 2010

Gerçeğin Gevşek Sınırları ve Belirsizin Kesinliği

Makale:
Gerçeğin Gevşek Sınırları ve Belirsizin Kesinliği

Emine Köseoğlu

YAPI Dergisi,
Kasım 2010, Sayı 349, s.112-114.

Fotoğraf, psikoloji ve felsefenin buluştuğu noktada bir makale...

Monday, October 25, 2010

Alışveriş Birimleri Tasarımı

Makale:
Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Davutpaşa Kampusu Alışveriş Birimleri Tasarımı

Yazarlar:
Deniz Erinsel Önder, Öze Uluengin, Emine Köseoğlu

---
Mimarlık Dekorasyon Dergisi
2010/10, Sayı 201, Sayfa 26-31.

---
Proje Ekibi:
Doç. Dr. Deniz Erinsel Önder, Arş. Gör. Öze Uluengin, Arş. Gör. Emine Köseoğlu, Yardımcı: Abdulkerim Gündüz (YTÜ Mimarlık Bölümü Lisans Öğrencisi)

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Mimari Tasarım 4 dersi Tanıtım Dosyası

  






Mimari Tasarım 4 Dersi tanıtım dosyası
Grafik Tasarım: Emine Köseoğlu


Friday, July 30, 2010

The effect of user participation in satisfaction: Beyciler after-earthquake houses in Düzce

Journal Paper:

"The effect of user participation in satisfaction: Beyciler after-earthquake houses in Düzce"

2010, ITU A/Z Journal, Vol.7, No.1, pp.18-37.

Authors: Deniz Erinsel Önder
Emine Köseoğlu
Ömer Bilen
Venhar Der

Abstract

Natural disasters that have occurred in recent years in Turkey have caused loss of property as well as deaths. Thus, they have necessitated the immediate construction of much housing. Many users neither adopted this housing, nor settled into it. The aim of this paper is to explore how user participation in design and construction process affects user satisfaction. As part of the study, a questionnaire was run (n=100) in a mass housing area with 168 units in Düzce, which was realized by the participation of the users after the 1999 Marmara earthquakes. The results of the questionnaire were evaluated on SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) using one sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test. Results showed that, in terms of houses‘ exterior spaces and general characteristics, there is no significant difference between the residents who participated to design and construction process and who did not. As for psychological needs and quality of interior spaces, the degree of satisfaction of the users that participated in the design and construction process was found higher than the ones that did not participated. In general, the study revealed that not only were the users pleased to have been involved in the process, but they were also satisfied with their accommodation.

Keywords: Residential quality, user satisfaction, participatory design.

For full text:

http://www.az.itu.edu.tr/azvol07no1.htm
http://www.az.itu.edu.tr/azv7n1web/04onderkoseoglubilender0701.pdf

Saturday, June 19, 2010

Book Review

Book Review by Emine Koseoglu
Modern Turkish architecture: 1900–1980, by Renata Holod, Ahmet Evin and Suha Özkan, Ankara, Chamber of Architects of Turkey, 2005, 194 pp., 80 TL (Turkish Liras) for 2 volume boxed set (paperback), ISBN 975 395 872 4

Architecture in Turkey around 2000: issues in discourse and practice, by Tansel Korkmaz, Ankara, Chamber of Architects of Turkey, 2005, 175 pp., 80 TL (Turkish Liras) for 2 volume boxed set (paperback), ISBN 975 395 890 0

Planning Perspectives, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp.383-408, July 2010.


http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a923172351~frm=titlelink

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Analysing the Concept of Legibility

article:
Analysing the Concept of Legibility
Authors: Emine Koseoglu, Deniz Erinsel Onder

YAPI, June 2010, Issue 343, pp.52-56.

Summary:
When the concept of spatial legibility is defined as an observation, seeing, understanding, analysis or evaluation, it becomes possible to speak of as many readings or methods as there are dimensions or directions in the space or urban space. Yet spatial legibility differs from the concept of reading. The concept of legibility occurs as one of the principles of urban design in literature on the subject.

Many researchers give a definition of legibility, and the principle source they cite is Kevin Lynch, who defines legibility as follows: "Legibility means the possibility of organising an environment within a noticeable and consistent texture." According to Lynch, the easier it is to form a mental image of an environment, the easier it is to read. Other researchers have defined ¬legibility as a concept that provides a meaning which helps to create and give direction to a mental map, and points to the characteristics of a large-scale environment. Reading an environment is a process that evolves with the obtaining of spatial information from the environment concerned, and by mentally processing that information using it in a way appropriate to its purpose. Two components play a part in the process of obtaining spatial information: the characteristics of the space and the characteristics of the observer. The observer's perception and understanding of the characteristics of a space occurs as a result of spatial-psychological processes that happen in the mind. These processes are influenced by the personal characteristics of the observer. At the same time legibility is influenced by spatial characteristics. Whether a space is legible depends on the plan layout in the second dimension and its complexity, and whether the architectural components in the third dimension are discernible.


Literature on the subject contains many concepts that define legible environments: simple, consistent, understandable, perceivable, organisable, etc. All these concepts point to characteristics deriving from the structure of the space. However, it is impossible to measure legibility by these concepts. For this reason the model discussed in this article uses two variables to devise a definition based on characteristics deriving from space: 1. the complexity of spatial layout and 2. the definability of sign elements. The complexity of spatial layout describes the two-dimensional information about a space, while the definability of sign elements describes the three-dimensional information about a space. These two variables are also the elements of spatial information used while finding direction.

Mekansal Okunabilirlik Kavramının Çözümlenmesi

makale:
Mekansal Okunabilirlik Kavramının Çözümlenmesi
Yazarlar: Emine Köseoğlu, Deniz Erinsel Önder
Yapı Dergisi, Haziran 2010, Sayı 343, s.52-56.



Mekanın okunabilirliği, okumak kavramından farklıdır. Okunabilirlik kavramı, literatürde, kentsel tasarım ilkelerinden biri olarak geçmektedir.